BUT
IF (the entrance to a blind alley) HAS THE SHAPE OF A DOORWAY THERE IS NO NEED
TO REDUCE IT EVEN THOUGH IT IS WIDER THAN TEN CUBITS
What is not clear is if
this “shape of a doorway” refers only to the width, or to the height as well.
If the cross-beam is too high (over 20 cubits) but it still “has the shape of a
doorway” does it still need to be reduced?
And what is a “shape of
a doorway”?
On both these points
there are many debates. Perhaps a doorway is defined by the ability to have a
door (even if one is not present). This might be shown by marks for hinges.
There is also a mention of “Semitic” doors (coming from the name of Noah’s son Shem
– as in, those from the Philistine or Palestinian areas) which may be doors
without side-posts or without lintels.
What about an archway?
R. Shesheth met Rabbah b. Samuel and asked him, ‘Has
the Master learnt anything about the shape of a doorway?’ — ‘Yes’, the other replied,
‘we have learnt: An arched [doorway], said R. Meir, is subject to the obligation
of a mezuzah but the Sages exempt it.
Since a doorway must be
a minimum of 4 handbreadths wide to have a mezuzah attached, does an
arch count? After all the top of the arch is by definition less (as in – 0 handbreadths!).
Perhaps it depends on the height of the sides before the arch begins.
They agree, however that if its lower section (before
the arch begins) was ten handbreadths in height [the doorway] is subject to the
obligation.
And Abaye stated: All agree that, if [an arched
doorway] was ten handbreadths high but its lower section was less than three
[handbreadths in height], or even if the lower section was three [handbreadths
high] but its total height was less than ten handbreadths, the doorway is not
valid at all.
There was reported
architectural disagreement about the home the leader of the Jewish community in
Babylon – the Exilarch:
‘If you meet the people of the Exilarch's house’, (R.
Shesheth) said to (Rabbah b. Samuel), ‘tell them nothing whatever of the Baraitha
about the arched doorway’.
Some things are better
left unmentioned!
No comments:
Post a Comment