But on our page there is a question as to whether any of
this is necessary. Does possession have to be transferred?
It was stated: The food for the shittuf
of alleys, Rab ruled, requires no transfer of possession, and Samuel ruled: It
does require transfer of possession. . .
And so a story is told:
The question of transfer is a point
at issue between Tannas. For Rab Judah related in the name of Rab: The
daughter-in-law of R. Oshaia was once overtaken by dusk (on the eve of Shabbat)
when she went to a bath house (beyond the Sabbath limit) and her mother-in-law
prepared for her an ‘erub.
R. Hiyya to whom the incident was
reported forbade her return. “Babylonian”, said R. Ishmael son of R. Jose to
him, “are you so strict about the laws of ‘erub? Thus said my father: ‘Wherever
you see an opportunity of relaxing the laws of ‘erub seize it!’”
The discussion then goes to the question of what the
mother-in-law might have done wrong. Did she neglect to transfer the possession
or was it that all was done without the daughter-in-law’s knowledge. In either
case, though, the statement of R. Hiyya’s father is that the goal of eruv
is to make people’s lives easier, not harder!
No comments:
Post a Comment