What is Talmud Tweets?

What is Talmud Tweets? A short, personal take on a page of Talmud - every day!

For several years now, I have been following the tradition of "Daf Yomi" - reading a set page of Talmud daily. With the start of a new 7 1/2 year cycle, I thought I would share a taste of what the Talmud offers, with a bit of personal commentary included. The idea is not to give a scholarly explanation. Rather, it is for those new to Talmud to give a little taste - a tweet, as it were - of the richness of this text and dialogue it contains. The Talmud is a window into a style of thinking as well as the world as it changed over the centuries of its compilation.

These are not literal "tweets" - I don't limit myself to 140 characters. Rather, these are intended to be short, quick takes - focusing in on one part of a much richer discussion. Hopefully, I will pique your interest. As Hillel says: "Go and study it!" (Shabbat 31a)

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Shabbat 102 - Throw and Catch; It's a Dog's Life

This page begins a new section dealing with laws of "building." But before we get there, one last thing having to do with "carrying" - throwing:

IF ONE THROWS [AN ARTICLE] AND RECALLS [THAT IT IS THE SABBATH] AFTER IT LEAVES HIS HAND, AND ANOTHER CATCHES IT, OR A DOG CATCHES IT, OR IT IS BURNT (by falling into a furnace), HE IS NOT LIABLE.

Now this is pretty interesting. An action (throwing) is begun and remembering occurs after the object is no longer under the person's control: he is free of culpability (for Sabbath violations - he would still have to pay for any damages!) this would not be the case if, for example, the object was tied to his hand with a chord and he could pull it back before it landed!

"Remembering" by the way, could be either that the day is Shabbat, or that throwing is not permitted on Shabbat.

And here, the Mishnah gives a general principle:

ALL WHO ARE LIABLE TO SIN-OFFERINGS ARE LIABLE ONLY IF THE BEGINNING AND THE END [OF THE FORBIDDEN ACTION] ARE UNWITTING.

The Talmud then discusses an absurd circumstance to help understand the general principle:

"[What if the object travels] two cubits unwittingly, two cubits deliberately, and two cubits unwittingly"

That is: he throws, remembers, and then forgets again, all before the object lands. Wow, forgetful tosser! Actually there is disagreement about his liability. Also if a dog catches it. It depends: was that his intention? Or is this a last minute excuse to get around the law?

Don't use this as an way to play catch with Rover! At least not on Shabbat.

No comments:

Post a Comment