Another fascinating
Astronomy/Astrology paragraph is on this page. But I cannot pass up a statement
that goes to the heart of the nature of the universe!
The story is told that
when G-d wanted to create the flood in Noah's time, G-d plucked out two stars
from the constellation Kimah (Pleiades).
Presumably this let the waters from the upper heavens (above the spheres that
hold the starts) pour down to Earth. When G-d was ready for the flood to end,
G-d took two stars from 'Ayish (the Bear) and
plugged the holes from the first two stars. The question is asked, why didn't
G-d just put the missing stars back where they came from? The answer: "A
pit cannot be filled with its own clods." Ok, then why didn't G-d just
make two new stars to fill the holes? Here's the answer that astonished me:
"There is nothing new under the sun." (Eccl. 1:9)
This is a statement of
the classic "static
universe" theory of cosmology - the universe is exactly as it was and
will be (aside from small, local variations). This was, in fact, the theory Einstein
preferred - he invented the "Cosmological Constant" to
mathematically keep it that way. It was only with Edwin Hubble's 1929
observations linking redshift and distance that it became clear the Universe is
expanding, giving credence to the "Big Bang" Theory. Coupled with
20th century details of stellar evolution we see the universe as a far more
dynamic place than previous generations did.
No comments:
Post a Comment